Do Long-Term Contracts In The NHL Make Any Sense?

By Chris Boersma

This article assumes that:

For players that the team has filed an LTI exception, the team is allowed to exceed the cap by up to the amount of the injured player’s salary with as many replacement players as needed, provided that when the injured player is activated the team comes into compliance with the cap immediately.

In this article I am only referencing situations where the LTI (long term injury) is in fact a permanent injury where there is no possibility to return. This means that while the salary counts towards the cap it also increases the cap by the injured player’s salary, which is equivalent to the salary not counting towards the cap and the cap being unchanged (for permanent injury situation, which are not discussed in the CBA).

Why do teams sign long term contracts?

sedin Do Long Term Contracts In The NHL Make Any Sense?There have been a number of extremely long contracts signed in the NHL since the lockout largely due to salary cap rules. The Vancouver Sun had an interested article written about precisely that on June 19, 2009 (image to the left). There isn’t really an explanation why teams would sign these contracts or why these contracts are able to reduce the salary cap hit. The first long term contract was signed by New York Islanders and Charles Wang was criticized at length by fans and sports writers for such an irrationally long contract. Even after DiPietro’s significant injury(s?) other teams are now singing very similar contracts with their players. Why would teams do what many outside of the hockey business community think are irrational?


12-year vs. 1-year

Let’s assume a very simple world where two things are true: player has the options to sign a very long contract or a 1-year contract. And that there is no inflation, or no price changes from year to year. As a result if a player is just as good as they were last year then they will receive the same salary as they did last year.

Let’s work with the Sedin’s contract: As per the article attached the Sedin’s are willing to sign for 5.25 million per season for 12 years, this means that so long as the Sedin’s are willing to play for the Canucks (they do not retire) they will receive 5.25 million per year.

In contrast imagine if the Sedin’s decided to sign 1 year agreements for 12 years instead, how much they would require for the 1-year contract to be equivalent to the 12 year contract?

Now, before you jump to the conclusion that this amount would be the same as a 12-year contract imagine now that after 1 season one of the Sedin’s had a career ending injury. If the player had signed a 12 year contract he would continue to receive his annual salary, if the player had signed a 1 year contract instead his compensation would cease after 1 year and he would have significantly less money than if he had signed a 12 year contract.

Insurance

Of course both the player can choose to insure this lost income (so long as they can find a willing insurance company who wants to risk millions of dollars on a dangerous sport). The willing partner could insure the player lost income if the team chooses not to sign him due to injury. The player of course would have to pay a premium to do so, but could guarantee his income for 12 years as the long term contract did automatically. (Realistically a player would likely pay annual premium for $x million worth of future earning coverage, which would decrease every year – not sure if there’s a market for this though, however the example below will use a fixed payment insurance policy to simplify things).

Below I have attached a table that summarizes these two worlds:12yr.vs.1yr Do Long Term Contracts In The NHL Make Any Sense?P(active) = probability the player is not injured
- Note I used a 5% chance the player has a career ending injury, this might be a little high, but it makes the numbers look better.

Money = Average amount of money paid by the team to that particular player.

CAP = Average cap hit to team as a result of this particular player + replacement player if injured

Diff = Average loss to player as a result of getting a career ending injury

Ins. = Insurance – The average cost associated with finding a replacement player when the player has a career ending injury.

In the 12-year contract the team pays both replacement player salary (if the signed player is injured) and the injured player’s salary. In the 1-year situation the team only pays the non-injured players salary, if the player wants to insure their earning that is their problem. To make both situations equivalent (player guaranteed $63 million after 12 years) the player would be requires to buy an insurance policy for their lost earnings.

In my example, a 12-year contract results in the team having to pay:

$63 million to Signed player

$14.7 million to replacement player due to injuries.

——-

$77.7 million net cost of signing.

However, the $14.7 million would not matter in terms of cap concerns though…

In my example, a 1-year contract results in the team having to pay:

$63 million to signed player

$19.2 million to replacement player due to injuries.

——-

$82.2 million net cost, but entire amount counts towards the cap.

The team who chooses the longer term contract not only pays essentially the same total cost for player salaries, but in the long term contract the injury replacement do no effect the cap, whereas the replacement do effect the cap in the short term contracts. The difference is essentially who is buying the insurance. If the team pays for the insurance it is not charged against the cap, whereas if the player buys the insurance it is charged against the cap. I’m not sure if players actually buy these injury insurance policies or if they just self insure the risk.

So if anyone ever asks you why teams would sign such long term contracts the answer is simple: insurance is part of the cap for short term contracts and is not part of the cap in the long term contracts.

My Opinion

My belief is that these contracts are bad for the NHL in general. I think it create stagnation in teams. These rules make teams boring as there is very little change. It means that the stars will stay in one place for a long time without the possibility of going to a different team. Player’s however benefit significantly from these agreements: they have guaranteed wages and know where they will be living for the few years and can settle down (buy and house, move kids to a new school they might graduate in). That’s not to say players wouldn’t be nervous about these contracts. Specifically they would worry about management changing priorities and the being stuck in the NHL’s worst team for 12 years.

I still think the costs associated with these contracts are a turn off for many General Managers. Unless the General Manager has an unlimited budget it’s hard to a owner asking to sign off on a $63 million dollar contract (that could backfire).

I think there should be enough natural disincentives to these contracts to keep them becoming the norm, but teams who sign them will be rewarded with the extra cap space they need to sign better players.


Stats Corner: Looking At Garret Anderson

I caught the last inning of the Braves/Red Sox game today. De Sawx won 1-zippo.

But I don’t care about that so much. What interested me is a comment made by Thom Brennanananman about Garret Anderson. Something to the effect of “he’s been one of the best hitters in all of baseball over the last 15 years”.

I was bored and decided to check out Garret’s shtatishtics.

In a career mostly played in Anaheim with the Angels (he’s now with Atlanta), he’s been a .296 hitter. He’s slugged .467 with an OBP of . 327. He has 275 career HRs.

They’re alright I guess. But the “among the best”?

Really?

Shoot, his OPS is a very average .793.


Has Tevez made a mistake?

By Tom Malley

After months of claim, counter claim, conjecture and rumour it is now confirmed that Carlos Tevez is to leave Manchester United. That may not come as a surprise to some, but what I think did raise a few eyebrows was that it was Tevez who decided to leave, rather than Manchester United deciding not to offer him a new deal.

carlos tevez ball Has Tevez made a mistake?

Carlos Tevez

As Tevez grabbed two vital goals towards the end of Manchester United’s title winning campaign the crowd’s appeal to the United board to sign the Argentinean up reached fever pitch. When the record breaking deal to sell Ronaldo to Real Madrid was revealed I thought it would only be a matter of time before the Tevez deal was sealed. After all that gave United the finance to complete the transfer and Tevez a gap in the starting XI to aim for.

But ultimately I think United’s refusal to see Tevez as a first choice striker in the big games and their hesitation to hand him a new deal forced Tevez’s hand.

As honest and hard-working a player as you can find, you get the impression that all he wants to do above everything else is play regular football. He could quite happily play second fiddle at United and still pick up bagfuls of medals and the adulation of the fans. But in making the move I think his patience has worn thin.
But is he making a mistake?

After all, look at the two clubs after him, Man City and Chelsea. If he made the short journey across Manchester he would, of course, be joining a side rapidly filling with expensive imports. However, that is no guarantee for success and it could be a few more years before City have the squad to upset the football odds and compete regularly for top honours – is that too long a wait?

Chelsea are much more likely to be in the shake up for honours in the coming years but the big spending Londoners have a huge squad themselves. There may be no more guarantee of more games there than there is at Old Trafford.

Either way it is a pivotal point in Tevez’s career and is certainly the less comfortable option. If it pays off he could bag himself more games, more goals and lots of trophies. If it goes wrong, he may take a long rueful look at Old Trafford the next time they add to their ever-burgeoning list of honours.


Stats Corner: Top Performing NHL Goalies

By Chris Boersma; Hockey Numbers.
I have been compiling goaltending data since 2003-2004 and felt now was a good time to join it all together in one large database so I can produce statistics that you see below. The tables below include data from playoffs and regular season from 2003-2004 2005-2006 to 2008-2009 (excluding the 2003-2004 playoffs). The database contains over 300,000 shots in over 6000 games.

Top 10 – Total Shots Against.

N Name SQN SV S G EG D
1 Miikka Kiprusoff 0.907 0.912 9208 808 830 22
2 Roberto Luongo 0.917 0.919 8923 723 835 112
3 Martin Brodeur 0.912 0.918 8223 678 738 60
4 Ryan Miller 0.902 0.913 8201 717 705 -12
5 Henrik Lundqvist 0.916 0.916 8060 680 778 98
6 Tomas Vokoun 0.919 0.921 7513 597 709 112
7 Marc-andre Fleury 0.905 0.909 7505 682 688 6
8 Marty Turco 0.903 0.905 7500 713 707 -6
9 Cam Ward 0.909 0.905 7329 693 728 35
10 Tim Thomas 0.916 0.919 7167 580 665 85
Top 10 – Goals Prevented.
N Name SQN SV S G EG D
1 Tomas Vokoun 0.919 0.921 7513 597 709 112
2 Roberto Luongo 0.917 0.919 8923 723 835 112
3 Henrik Lundqvist 0.916 0.916 8060 680 778 98
4 Tim Thomas 0.916 0.919 7167 580 665 85
5 Cristobal Huet 0.916 0.919 5454 444 507 63
6 Martin Brodeur 0.912 0.918 8223 678 738 60
7 Dominik Hasek 0.918 0.915 3898 332 390 58
8 Jonas Hiller 0.927 0.926 2303 171 225 54
9 J.S. Giguere 0.910 0.913 6738 588 630 42
10 Niklas Backstrom 0.913 0.922 5030 391 431 40
Top 10 – Save Percentage (+3000 shots)
N Name SQN SV S G EG D
1 Niklas Backstrom 0.913 0.922 5030 391 431 40
2 Tomas Vokoun 0.919 0.921 7513 597 709 112
3 Cristobal Huet 0.916 0.919 5454 444 507 63
4 Roberto Luongo 0.917 0.919 8923 723 835 112
5 Tim Thomas 0.916 0.919 7167 580 665 85
6 Martin Brodeur 0.912 0.918 8223 678 738 60
7 Henrik Lundqvist 0.916 0.916 8060 680 778 98
8 Dominik Hasek 0.918 0.915 3898 332 390 58
9 Manny Fernandez 0.913 0.915 3557 304 334 30
10 Ilja Bryzgalov 0.905 0.914 5635 487 495 8
Top 10 – Shot Quality Neutral Save Percentage (+3000 shots)
N Name SQN SV S G EG D
1 Tomas Vokoun 0.919 0.921 7513 597 709 112
2 Dominik Hasek 0.918 0.915 3898 332 390 58
3 Roberto Luongo 0.917 0.919 8923 723 835 112
4 Cristobal Huet 0.916 0.919 5454 444 507 63
5 Henrik Lundqvist 0.916 0.916 8060 680 778 98
6 Tim Thomas 0.916 0.919 7167 580 665 85
7 Niklas Backstrom 0.913 0.922 5030 391 431 40
8 Manny Fernandez 0.913 0.915 3557 304 334 30
9 Martin Brodeur 0.912 0.918 8223 678 738 60
10 J.S. Giguere 0.910 0.913 6738 588 630 42

All the data for all goalies can be found here.
SQN – shot quality neutral save percentage – a save percentage that adjusts for the difficulty of the shots (If a goalie faces a lot of easier shots then their SQN will be lower than their save percentage. Similarly, if a goalie faces more difficult shots (rebounds, powerplay, etc.) they will have a higher SQN than their Save percentage
SV – Save percentage = 1-Goals/Shots
S – Shots against
G – Goals against
EG – Expected goals – The number of goals that should be scored against a goalie given how difficult the shot is to stop.
D = EG – G – Goals Prevent – how many goals a goalie stopped compared to how many you would expect him to stop.

Pic from custode.com


101 Baseball-Related Things To Do With Your Kids Before You Die.

By Rebecca Glass

101: Slide the slide at Miller Park.
100: Sit in one of the kayaks in McCovey Cove, waiting for a home run ball.
99: Wait out a multi-hour rain delay, till there are so few in the park that your voice can get picked up by the TV broadcast.
98: Do something really, really stupid on the Diamondvision.
97: Watch your favorite team on the road, while they’re visiting the most hated rival’s hometown.
96. Take a multi-city road trip to watch baseball. Some examples: Boston->NY (x2) ->Philadelphia ->Baltimore ->DC; NY (x2) -> Philadelphia -> Pittsburgh -> Cincinnati –> Chicago (x2)-> Cleveland ; Arizona -> San Diego -> LA -> Anaheim -> San Francisco -> Oakland
95. Sample the regional ballpark flavor…
94. …Or go with hot dogs, peanuts and cracker jacks.
93. Make a mix of your favorite players’ AB music to play in the car on the way to the stadium/park/field.
92. Catch a foul ball with your bare hands.
91. Catch a foul ball with your beer.
90. Catch a foul ball and give it to the kid sitting next to you who is attending his/her first Major League game.
89. Go to a Major League game in a different country (okay, Toronto).
88. Go to any professional game in a different country.
87. Try explaining the rules of baseball to a cricket fan and see how far you get.
86. Come early enough not just to see BP but to be the very first fans let into the stadium/park/field.
85. Go to a minor league game in the cold and rain. Go sit out by the bullpen and just watch. Trust me.
84. Buy a program and try to keep score during a very much non-pitchers’ duel.
83. Wear your teams’ colors in enemy territory, on game day, in October, when both of you are playing.
82. Stay up, on the East Coast, for the entirety of a game on the West Coast.
81. Sneak down from the upper deck to seats oh-so-closer to the field (you’ll have better luck in Pittsburgh than New York).
80. Spend a major summer holiday at a ballgame.
79. Be the last fans to leave the park.
78. Make the journey to see the Cape Cod League.
77. Go to Fanfest–it’s cheaper (and maybe even more fun) than the All Star Game and the Home Run Derby.
76. Visit a ballpark in its last year before demolition…
75. …And a new one in its first year.
74. Say hello to a beat writer (this one may take some advance planning).
73. Say hello to a blogger (this one will likely take a little less planning, and may not be considered an essential experience by most)
72. Score tickets to a luxury box, and while everyone else is dressed to the nine’s, walk in wearing old jeans and an oversized team t-shirt.
71. Where possible, take public transportation to and from the game. Especially Boston and NY.
70. Go to a game on a whim, with no advance planning. Buy tickets on Stubhub or some other source that day and ust hightail it to the park.
69. Listen to a game at home, on the radio, while having a catch with your kid/father/brother/sister/other family member.
68. Take a drive past where Ebbets Field/The Polo Grounds/Tiger Stadium/The Vet/The Kingdome, etc, used to be and see how much you can remember, or pretend to remember.
67. Help restore a Little League field…
66. …Or otherwise sponsor/coach/help out a Little League team.
65. Take an umpiring class, or two. For the hell of it.
64. Fill out an all star ballot with your father/son/daughter/mother, together, and then another seperatley and compare.
63. Skip going to a game in favor of playing one, instead.
62. Eat Ice Cream together in the upper deck. In August. In Texas/Atlanta/Baltimore/DC…even NY.
61. Make the long drive up to Cooperstown in the dead of winter and visit the Hall and especially the Museum.
60. Visit Monument Park at Yankee Stadium (but maybe after they move it)
59. Watch the Mets and Yankees, or Cubs and White Sox, or Giants and A’s in the same day.
58. Take a Stadium Tour (Most stadiums have this option)
57. If the schedule allows it, go to a football game on a Sunday in September and a baseball night game (or the other way around).
56. Try to get through Field of Dreams without crying.
55. Watch A League of Their Own with your daughter (ok, and son, too).
54. Teach your kid how to properly break in a mitt/glove, how to work a scuff and how to properly chew sunflower seeds.
53. Take a cross country drive, listening to all of the local games on the radio, minor or major league.
52. Write a letter to your favorite player.
51. Write a letter to a rookie or another underrated player. Don’t ask for an autograph. See if he responds.
50. Start a baseball card collection.
49. Spend way too much money on a Jeter/Pujols/Ichiro/Whomever rookie card.
48. Walk around a memorabilia store for the pure and utter heck of it.
47. Create an album, online or real, of pictures, ticket stubs, and scorecards of games you’ve been to.
46. Try, just try, to get tickets to a Cubs game in October. If you succeed, try (just try), to cheer them on to the Fall Classic.
45. Read The Natural.
44. Buy the highlight video from the last season your team won the World Series (sorry Cubs fans…)
43. Buy an overpriced soemthing at the team store. Preferably a jersey.
42. Teach your kid about Jackie Robinson. And Larry Doby. And Roberto Clemente. And everything that meant.
41. While we’re on the topic, visit the Negro League Museum in Kansas City.
40. Get into a heated argument about the merits of the DH.
39. Buy the Baseball America Prospect Guide, pick one, and follow his development throughout the season.
38. Buy tickets from a sketchy scalper in the parking garage before the game.
37. Watch the Cyclones take on the Staten Island Yankees.
36. Visit Babe Ruth’s house/museum in Baltimore and then watch the Orioles at Camden Yards.
35. Send a “Get Well Soon” card to a player with a season-ending injury.
34. Donate a body part so you can sit behind home plate.
33. Or go to a minor league game for a team not well attended and pay all of $10 for seats behind the plate.
32. Watch the Batting Stances guy on Youtube. Try to outdo him.
31. Get your eye socket broken by an errant throw (@crotch_jenkins to thank for this one…)
30. Visit Williamsport, PA.
29. Visit Omaha in June.
28. Play snow baseball.
27. Put your kid’s name up on Daimondvision for his/her birthday.
26. Watch the Little League World Series with your kid. Especially if your kid’s lucky enough to play in it.
25. Keep a blog, even if just for yourself, about your team for one season.
24. Tweet with baseball players (like @dougiebaseball) (Again this one might not be essential, but it’s awesome).
23. Build a baseball library in your home.
22. Go and support your high school/college team just for kicks.
21. Get tickets to both games of a double header. Stay for the whole thing.
20. Try the fastpitch machine at the ballpark. I throw about 30 MPH. What about you?
19. Play the Show on PS3/XboX/whatever. And then play Griffey on N64. Because that game was just that awesome.
18. Be in the stands for a no hitter.
17. Stay for a game that goes to the fifteenth inning.
16. Get a baseball card signed by that player.
15. Check out the pool in Arizona (is it still there?)
14. And pet the Rays in Tampa.
13. Get a hotel room in Toronto with a view of the field.
12. Search for Jane Austen’s reference to “base ball” in Northanger Abbey.
11. Debate on what the best name in baseball is–Buddy Bell? Skip Schumacker (sp)?
10. Take Spanish and Japanese lessons so you can understand (some) of what the players are saying.
9. Watch a game in a different language, just because you can.
8. Teach kids that baseball players are human–they can err and redeem themselves just the same.
7. Buy tickets to Game 7 of the World Series, wherever it is. You never know.
6. Glory in the knowledge that it ain’t over til it’s over.
5. Sit in the Monster seats at Fenway.
4….And in the right field bleachers at Yankee Stadium
3….And in the rooftop seats overlooking Wrigley
2. Skip school (and work) to go to Opening Day.
1. Play catch when it’s too dark to safely do so.


Best 21 College Running Backs In The Nation In 2009

By Drew Smith

Fantasy College Blitz

medium tulane05 222x300 Best 21 College Running Backs In The Nation In 2009

A good fantasy pick

1) Andre Anderson – Tulane: Anderson was off to a fantastic start last year before busting up his shoulder in the 7th game of the season against Rice. He had 854 and 7 scores through the first 6 games including two tough matchups against Alabama and East Carolina. Based on the talent of Anderson and the schedule he plays, the only thing preventing him from being the top fantasy back this season is whether or not his shoulder holds up. In a year with no clear cut #1 back, Anderson has too much upside to not be the first back off the board.2) LeGarrette Blount – Oregon : Blount is far more talented that Anderson and would probably run for 2500 yards playing for Tulane, but instead he is stuck behind a make-shift offensive line playing in the Pac-10. Blount also showed up out-of-shape in the spring, plays for a system that historically splits carries, and has some discipline concerns that prevent him from being the clear-cut #1 running back. With all of that said, he is arguably the most talented running back in the country coming off a season in which he ran for 1002 yards and 17 TDs on only 137 carries, which equates to a mind-boggling 7.3 ypc. While Oregon has shared carries in the past, there isn’t really a back-up RB that is worthy of stealing a ton of carries. The Duck’s offense will score 40+ points a game this year making Blount a lock for 20+ TDs this season. Yeah, there are risks… but all the backs this year have risks.

3) James Starks – Buffalo : There is two sides of the argument that could be made regarding Starks in 2009. One argument claims that with Drew Willy graduating, defenses will be able to focus on stopping the running game and thus making it difficult for Starks to repeat his 2008 season of almost 1700 yards combined with 17 total TD difficult. The other argument claims that Buffalo will need to rely on Starks even more and the MAC defenses aren’t good enough to stop him, even if they know he is coming as we saw with Kevin Smith a few years ago with UCF. I think the best approach is to draft him based on last year stats with the possibility of even better stats. Despite the loss Willy, the passing attack should still be good enough to keep defenses from stacking the line.

4) Jahvid Best – California : Best finished 2008 with 1580 rushing yards and 15 TDs with a ridiculous 8.1 ypc, and yet this was somewhat disappointing in my eyes. Best was in the doghouse early in the season followed by a minor injury in which he only got 21 total carries in a 3 game span. It is easy to over-project Best by saying in a full season he will run for 2000 yards. While he could if he got enough carries, the reality is that Best is a small back with a capable backup in Shane Vereen, so expect to see his carries be limited to around 200 as the coaching staff attempts to keep him healthy.

5) Jacquizz Rodgers – Oregon State : Rodgers burst on the scene as a true freshman running for 1253 yards and 11 TDs and should once again be one of the top backs in the country this season. Rodgers, like a lot of young backs with a heavy workload dealt with some nagging injuries, will need to shake that in order to take a step up to elite fantasy status.

6) Kendall Hunter – Oklahoma State : Hunter took advantage of the open space created by the high-powered spread offense of the Cowboys to run for 1555 yards and 16 TDs in 2008. With the offense returning most of its fire-power, Hunter is arguably one of the safest backs in the first two rounds.

7) Bryce Bell – Houston : I like Bell a lot in that offense but with games against Oklahoma State , Texas Tech and Mississippi State, I think his overall stats will be similar to last season. If you draft Bell and can get to Week 7 with a winning record then you are looking quite good since Bell should blow up in the second half of the season against C-USA what-a-be defenses.

icon cool Best 21 College Running Backs In The Nation In 2009 Damion Fletcher – USM: Fletcher had a disappointing season last year despite rushing for 1313 yards and 10 TDs because most people were expecting him to at least exceed his 2007 stats of 1586 yards and 15 TDs. Despite some off-season legal issues, I fully expect Fletcher to get back closer to his 2007 stats, if he can stay healthy.

9) Eugene Jarvis – Kent State : Jarvis had an injury-plagued season last year that limited his carries to only 165 for 801yards and 9 TDs. Jarvis is a little guy so injury is always a concern but he has proven to be able to carry the ball 250+ times in the past, and I expect him to get back to that level again this year.

10) John Clay – Wisconsin : Clay is a big talented running back who will be given every opportunity to be the next great Badger running back. Motivating issues and a nagging ankle injury could see him dropping in some leagues but makes for a great pick if you can get him as the 10th back off the board.

11) MiQuale Lewis – Ball State: Lewis had a magical season as he totaled over 2000 yards combined with 22 TDs, yet finds himself ranked as the 11th running back. The reason is that the loss of QB Nate Davis and head coach Brady Hoke has most people assuming Ball State will take a step back. Lewis makes for a risky pick inside the Top 8 RBs or so, but at this spot starts representing a good value compared to risk as the schedule is extremely weak for the Cardinals.

12) Harvey Unga – BYU: Unga has been a very consistent fantasy back over the last two years and is a player that could find himself in the Top 8 before the season ends once some question marks are answered. The Cougars have four new starters on the offensive line and a passing game that needs to find a new set of receivers. Regardless, for those folks who like to avoid risk, Unga in the 3rd round is the guy for you.

13) DeMarco Murray – Oklahoma : Some people are expecting a break-out season that will push him into the elite running back status but that is going to be difficult when splitting carries with Chris Brown. I expect to see a similar season as we saw in 2008 where he combined for 1397 yards and 18 TDs combined rushing/receiving.

14) Matt Asiata – Utah : A big-time sleeper at the running back position who is coming off a 707 yard and 12 TD season in 2008. Why the love? The Utes are expected to give most of the carries to Asiata this season, a TD machine, and should push 20 TDs this year. Utah has been a notorious running back-by-committee team so that is my only concern with Asiata, but all indications are that they do not plan on sharing carries and do not have any backs that seems ready to take carries.

15) Chris Brown – Oklahoma : The other half of the tandem in Norman that despite splitting carries finds himself in the Top 15 for running backs. Brown might not be the highlight reel, like Murray, but he is the guy that gets the rock inside the 10 making another 20 TD season likely.

16) C.J. Spiller – Clemson: This is a gamblers pick special since Spiller has never been a fantasy star, despite getting a ton of press as being one of the top backs in the country. The main reason was the presence of James Davis and a coach in Tommy Bowden that got off on seeing how cute he could get with the play-calling. Reading in-between the lines gives me the feeling that the Tigers are planning on getting Spiller the rock early and often- making him an excellent high-risk, high-return pick.

17) Jake Sharp – Kansas : Sharp is a blue-collar running back that will plug away for a 1000 yards combined. Not bad, but hardly anything to get excited about. However, the value comes with his TDs as the Jayhawks have a very potent offense and will give Sharp plenty of opportunity to score. Look for 1250+ combined yards with 15 TDs.

18) Brandon Minor – Michigan: Minor had an up and down season as he rode the bench for the first 6 games only to be a fantasy star for the next 3 games and then to finish the season banged-up. Minor will surely be a player that needs close attention over the next few months, but as of now he is slated to be the starting running back behind a monster offensive line in a fantasy friendly system for running backs.

19) Jonathan Dwyer – Georgia Tech: Dwyer is one of my favorite talents in college football but just plays in a system that splits the carries too much, which prevents fantasy super-stardom. In 2008 Dwyer carried the ball 200 times for 1395 yards and 12 TDs. I actually expect to see his carries drop down to the 175 range which, no matter how good he is, will limit his upside.

20) Toby Gerhart – Stanford: Gerhart ran for 1136 yards and 15 TDs last season and I expect to see a similar season from him again this year. The lack of receiving yards and splitting carries roughly 60/40 limits his upside.

21) Charles Scott – LSU: Scott is another running back who I am a big fan of talent-speaking, but is in a similar situation as Gerhart in that he doesn’t get receiving yards and has his carries limited as the Tigers want to be a passing team. Scott ran for 1174 yards and 18 TDs in 2008 and I expect him to put up similar stats again this year.


General Motors Should Aim To Be Like The Red Wings

greenbaypackers sng 287x300 General Motors Should Aim To Be Like The Red Wings

America's real team?

Has anyone noticed those GM commercials? Yeah, the one about resurrection or something. Oh, reinvention you say? Well, good for them I suppose. It would have been nice if it was 100% private but hey…it’s a sports blog.

Anyway, here’s a great article by Terry O’Reilly (I’m guessing not the former Boston Bruins player) of the Ottawa Citizen using boxing legend Joe Louis as a metaphor for GM’s rebirth. This being a sports blog, anytime you link anything to sports and you do a good job with it, you’ll get a link back.

But the scene of Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger throwing the pass that won the Super Bowl this year, with only 35 seconds to go, hints at the bigger story.

Roethlisberger symbolizes a great come-back-from-behind winner, and the Steelers have always been emblematic of the blue-collar working class”.

This reference got me thinking.

What other sports teams or athletes could have been used? Vince Lombardi’s dynasty Green Bay Packers of the 1960s comes to mind. Those Packers teams were the epitome of smash mouth, hard working, no-nonsense football. Much like the Steelers period of dominance in the 1970s.

detroit red wings 300x200 General Motors Should Aim To Be Like The Red Wings

In pursuit of excellence Wings style

What about hockey? The commercial shows a shot of  two hockey players for a second. Hockey in its humble origins, much like baseball, was a blue collar sport. Rather than use a shot of two unknown players, they could have found a more symbolic example.

In the Detroit Red Wings (four Stanley Cups in 14 years and six trips to the finals), you can’t ask for a better team. The Red Wings are literally an organization that rose from the dead (remember the Dead Things?) and resurrected itself to become possibly the best franchise in pro North American sports (relax, New England Patriots fans).

Joe Louis was a more poetic and remarkable story but don’t discount the Wings/GM connection. GM and Detroit are synonymous.

Oh, and don’t forget to use some Motown. Edwin Starr’s ‘Twenty-Five Miles’ for example.

So. What other teams do you think would fit?


Birth Of Something More In L.A.?

By Alex

NBA Tipoff

The Lakers won their 15th NBA Title in franchise history, and it’s number four for Kobe Bryant and his first without the Diesel.

But you see that picture up there? He is holding four fingers up, isn’t he?

Well, now he is going to have to hold is thumb up next year, I bet, because the Lakers are going to be the team to beat and may go to the Finals again next year.

With a little help from John Hollinger of ESPN on his research with all the big stats, I have all the details to give with statistics backing it up:

The Lakers won an NBA Championship without doing anything right. Pau Gasol was being soft all year but only brought it up a little notch. As I have said in one of my article about Gasol not being soft anymore, he was still a little soft.

And then there was Andrew Bynum, who was horrible throughout the whole span of the NBA Playoffs. Hollinger found out that he only scored 30 points and had 21 fouls in just the NBA Finals. That is four fouls per game!

Jeez.

And remember Jordan Farmar and Shannon Brown. They were supposed to help the aging 34-year-old veteran of Derek Fisher, but it turned out that Fisher was the one who was helping out Farmar and Brown.

And Farmar and Brown looked the guys who were aging as well.

Fisher didn’t play very well, shooting 39.3 percent of his shots and being 28.4 percent from the three-point line. Even though those aren’t very good stats, Fisher did average eight points per game and made some huge shots in Game Four of the NBA Finals.

But really, it didn’t matter about stats for Fisher, as he won his fourth NBA Title.

Then you got Sasha Vujacic, who was the man who made all the shots, especially the ones from downtown as he shot 43.7 percent from behind-the-arc in 2007, which got him an extension (and don’t forget the $15M!).

But in the NBA Finals, Vujacic didn’t even exist and was supposed to remove the hard-fought double-teams from number 24 and Mr. Softie (Pau Gasol). Vujacic failed. And remember when I just said he didn’t even exist in the NBA Finals, well…he didn’t. In the last seven games, he played a total of only 33 minutes!

That is about playing five minutes per game!

And guess what made it worse? He never made one single shot in the NBA Finals, as John Hollinger has reported.

But who gives? They won the NBA Finals but here is the biggest question for next year: can they repeat, and also, are they the team to beat next year? Last year, when Boston won, they were the team to beat, but unfortunately, they lost James Posey and some other guys and lost KG for a little while during the year. They were NOT the team to beat. That year, it was Cleveland, and they failed to reach their mark.

The Lakers are now the team to beat at the starting of the year, or so I have been told. But how can they? They have to key players, Lamar Odom and Trevor Ariza, who are going into free agency and it doesn’t look like they can sign both (Shannon Brown, too, but I don’t think they’ll need him).

Even if they can’t sign on of them, or both, Adam Morrison and Luke Walton will have to step up their game as they both have one year left of their contracts, as Hollinger reported.

Kobe Bryant and Derek Fisher will be the only starters next year who will be older than 30 in the lineup. Kobe, who will be turning 31, is in outstanding shape while Fisher still has it after he will be turning 35. We don’t if Fisher might retire though.

But hey, if you got a guy who can do this at a pretty old age, I think LA can keep him for about another two years or so.

For all we know, the Lakers can repeat but it will be tough. They might be losing three important guys: Trevor Ariza, Lamar Odom, and Shannon Brown. The Lakers have to somehow bring Ariza back for the sake of the 2009-2010 season next year.

If they keep Ariza, they could be the team to beat. Ariza was known for his top-notch steals in the Western Conference Finals, and his big three-pointers in the NBA Finals. If Ariza stays, Phil Jackson could win eleven titles.

And if the Lakers keep playing like they do, after finally winning a championship with the Diesel, big ol’ Phil can win about three more titles for his Los Angeles Lakers.

And back to the picture up there. Kobe, it’s time to put your thumb up soon.


Searching For Body-Building Secrets Exercise In Futility

By Sal Marinello

Health and Fitness Advice

Despite reams of evidence to the contrary too many personal trainers and consumers still think bodybuilding is a valid method of training. There are no such things as “bodybuilding secrets.”

Actually the secret of bodybuilding isn’t really a secret; anabolic drugs – steroids, human growth hormone, insulin and a whole host of other illicit chemicals – are responsible for creating the “sport” of bodybuilding.  Without drugs, bodybuilding would have never attracted the attention of the American public.

For all the showmanship and bravado possessed by Arnold Schwarzenegger, without steroids he wouldn’t have given us, “The Terminator,” “Conan the Barbarian,” or the iconic “Pumping Iron” in which he displayed the persona that catapulted him to fame. This isn’t meant to denigrate what Arnold accomplished, but to point out the stark reality.

No drugs, no Arnold, no bodybuilding, no Muscle & Fitness magazine, and the multi-billion dollar Hulk that is the fitness industry is a 97-pound puny weakling by comparison.  The fitness revolution initiated by Arnold and his steroid-taking Muscle Beach behemoths allowed bodybuilding to stake out the territory that bodybuilding occupies in the land of legitimate fitness.  Amazingly, almost 40 years later many personal trainers still employ the antiquated and flawed techniques favored by the anabolic using pioneers with their non-drug using clients.

Thankfully the mainstream has started to turn away from bodybuilding, also known as “reductionist training.” Members of the highest levels of the fitness profession never really embraced the methods of bodybuilding, which breaks down the movements of the body in to component parts.  Using machines and exercises to isolate/exercise one muscle group at a time, and following a split routine for workouts, is incredibly wasteful and counterproductive.

In a quest for bigger biceps and triceps, well-defined abdominal muscles and other appearance-based goals people still search the Internet for bodybuilding secrets.  The answers provided by bodybuilder-types are flawed, the exercises recommended don’t deliver on the promised results (without the drugs pro bodybuilders use) and the quest for other secrets continues.

The never-ending search for secrets – and in effect short cuts – is thanks to the flawed bodybuilding premise, that an improved appearance equals improved performance.  It isn’t sexy and it doesn’t sizzle, but there are no secret ways to build muscle, build fat free mass, burn fat, tone muscle or do any of the other things you can find when doing a Google search for “bodybuilding secrets.”


Will Real’s Spending Splurge Lead To Victory?

By John ST

There is a price for everything. Sir Alex Ferguson declared indignantly in December that he wouldn’t sell the Real Madrid mob a virus, not to mention his crowning jewel, Cristiano Ronaldo, but when an astronomical £80 million check is waved enticingly, principles can be swayed.

Last week, Real Madrid shocked the football community with their audacious raids in the transfer market. The arrival of Kaka and Cristiano Ronaldo, both winners of Ballon d’Or and FIFA Player of The Year, cost a cool £150 million.

Coupled with two other record fees , Luis Figo (a £37m purchase from Barcelona) and Zinedine Zidane (a £47m deal with Juventus), that is £220m on just four players. To put things in perspective, George Gillett and Tom Hicks paid just under that amount for Liverpool FC in a leveraged buyout.

cristianoronaldo5 300x206 Will Reals Spending Splurge Lead To Victory?

A team player?

Obscene money which distorts fair play, UEFA President Michel Platini says… but he ain’t see nothing yet. Rumors are rife that another six players (David Villa, David Silva, Xabi Alonso, Maicon, Franck Ribery, Raul Albiol) are on the way and the budget may balloon to more than £262m, easily eclipsing the lavish £217m spree by Roman Abramovich at Chelsea from 2003-2004.

If you developed queasy feelings of deja vu, it is understandable. After all, this is Florentino Perez’s second attempt at creating the Galacticos. Instead of recruiting world-class talents every summer during his first experiment, Perez has fast-tracked his burning ambition to see Madrid’s football recover “their place in the world.”

When Florentino Perez came into power at the Santiago Bernabeu in 2000, Real Madrid had just won the European Cup but not one to settle for mediocrity, he embarked on a breathtaking vision to assemble the best talents the world has ever seen.

This time round, Real Madrid finished nine points behind Barcelona and was eliminated from the Champions League at the first knockout stage for the fifth successive season. The abject failures stood in stark contrast to the fortunes of their arch rival.

Never before has a treble (La Liga, Champions league and Copa del Rey) been achieved in Spanish football, yet Barcelona scaled the pinnacle in Pep Guardiola’s debut managerial season – at Madrid’s expense too after a humiliating 6-2 derby defeat. Real Madrid had no reply to the attacking guile and midfield dominance of Barcelona. Each goal was a stab in the heart and rendered an impressive run of 17 victories in 18 games irrelevant.

What if Barcelona go on to achieve the unprecedented honor of retaining the Champions League title next season? Given the intense political, cultural and football rivalry between both clubs, the echelons of power in this fabled institution cannot stand aside and witness the ultimate glory of Barcelona.

Like any true-blue Real Madrid fan, Florentino Perez is anxious about the decline in the club’s prestige and desires the passion of being a Madridista to return. Soon after his re-election as President of Real Madrid, he set about the familiar task of breaking the bank and recruiting super players to level the playing field. His clarion call for Real Madrid to “do in one year what we would normally do in three,” signals his intention to deliver within a tight schedule.

Florentino Perez has a clear mandate to do the necessary and why not, after all, he is a proven success. You don’t buy a bankrupt construction company, and transform it into a multi-billion conglomerate, ACS, by ignoring project schedules and making empty promises.

Perez is particularly suited to the wheeling and dealing of business and football as he possesses acumen, charisma, political connections, enterprise, and persistence. Unfortunately, these are qualities which his counterpart, Ramon Calderon, was found to be sorely lacking.

There is little love lost for Ramon Calderon who had been accused of vote buying and skimming money from the vault when players were purchased. He was no slouch in spending money but his signings hardly qualify as the cream of the crop and no Spanish players were purchased.

Calderon’s saving grace was to claim some credit for the purchase of Cristiano Ronaldo. He hinted that the dirty work was done during his time: “Last season United decided not to do it because they thought it was too early and instead everyone agreed to do it this season. He [Ronaldo] wanted to come, he said that many times.”

Now, even if Perez took credit for Calderon’s work, there is no denying his ability to make things happen. His mantra being that money is no object and deficits don’t matter. Los Merengues can feel a twisted sense of pride and satisfaction to outbid Russian mogul Abramovich on all his targets, doing what Manchester City sheiks cannot by buying Kaka while they only have Gareth Barry to show for their ambitions next season, and finally Alex Ferguson, manager of one of the richest club (in terms of revenue), being forced to sell his prized asset.

To be sure, money is not the only consideration. Perez conceded that Real Madrid cannot match the financial prowess of Chelsea and Manchester City as they don’t have rich people to put money into the club. Footballers are attracted like moth to candlelight because of Madrid’s rich tradition of European and domestic triumphs as well as Perez’s personal charms.

You can see Perez’s brilliant mind at work with his creative financing and daring projections of future revenue streams for Real Madrid. Last time he wiped out Real Madrid’s debts in one fell stoke by selling off the club’s training ground for £298m to the city council. He has cash left over from clearing debts and use it to finance transfers.

This time, he managed to secure a credit line with Catalan bank, La Caixa. Against the backdrop of mounting bad loans for Spanish banks and limited access to credit, one has to marvel that Real Madrid has sponsors lining up to facilitate their transfer orgy.

The fact that Real Madrid is too big to fail certainly helps. The corridors of power in Spain will not risk the social and political fury of pushing Real Madrid into bankruptcy, thus any banks holding the debts of Real Madrid are relatively safe.

Barcelona’s economic director, Xavier Sala-i-Martin, is baffled by the financial logic behind Perez’s grand Galaticos project . “I do not know where the 300m euros that Florentino Perez thinks he has for signings actually comes from. He says he will recoup it by selling replica shirts and so he will have to sell 30 million of them. That is impossible.”

“How can it be that a football club has so much money to spend, bearing in mind the current economic situation in the country and the politics of credit restriction in place in all banks?”

But Perez saw no need to answer such trivial questions. His gamble on expanding revenue streams were successful in the past. According to the club, Madrid’s annual income had doubled in three years from 2000 to 2003. David Beckham’s four-year stay in Spain boosted sales of shirts and memorabilia by 137%.

Real Madrid overtook Manchester United by £32.5m as the richest club in the world in terms of revenue in 2008. They are keen to improve on last year’s meagre £102m in commercial revenue and £16.8m for reaching the first knock-out stage of the 2007-08 Champions League. In fact, the arrivals of Kaka and Cristiano Ronaldo sent number crunchers into overdrive. A fresh report predicted an additional £107m a season to Madrid in revenue from the pair.

La Liga’s policy of allowing clubs to negotiate individual contracts with broadcasters is a boon to Real Madrid. The more talents Real Madrid amassed, the more bargaining power it has in jacking up its TV revenue. The club also has the advantage of owning their own stadium and earned £80m in matchday revenue in 2007-08.

It is futile to argue with Perez as statistics have bore out the fact that the Galacticos policy is indeed successful in generating commercial benefits and reviving marketability of Real Madrid brand.

As Mark Twain once remarked that there are three kinds of lies: lies, damn lies, and statistics. So Perez there were few critics when Perez defended the galacticos policy as a model that feeds itself. He considered “Zidane was a cheap signing as his arrival allowed new commercial deals and new arrivals.”

Moreover, the fans have derived great entertainment by seeing a dream team in action. Football can be intoxicating when it is played beautifully, with fluid passing, silky dribbles, cheeky back-heels, heart-stopping goalmouth actions and extraordinary goals.

There is little wrong in giving the fans what they desire, solid entertainment for 90 minutes and then leaving the stadium with a smile on their faces. The entertainment value is well worth the money. Ask Sepp Blatter.

However, it is debatable if the Galacticos policy is the right way to attain football supremacy. Or is it another “insane” attempt (where insanity is defined as repeating the same procedures and expecting different results?)

Notwithstanding Real Madrid’s glamor and irresistible appeal, an aura of invincibility has not permeated the air. We all know how the first version of the galacticos fared. Let’s do a quick review.

Real Madrid purchased four winners of the Ballon d’Or: Luis Figo, Zinedine Zidane, Ronaldo and Michael Owen. However, their awards were not achieved in a Madrid shirt. The implication being that players peaked before arriving or the concept of the whole being greater than the sum of its parts did not materialize.

Initially, the policy paid off, when Real Madrid won 2 league titles and 1 Champions League title. Zidane who had already unleashed his talent as Juventus playmaker, gained a higher profile by orchestrating the Madrid midfield and scoring impossible goals. The Brazilian Ronaldo was a goal scoring machine, terrorizing defences and hitting the back of the net for fun, thanks to the effervescent Zidane.

Then there was Figo on the right flank, who could leave any defender stranded with his dribbling skills. Roberto Carlos was scoring 30 yard screamers regularly. Makelele, arguably the best defensive midfielder, also showcased his defensive ability and his short, simple passes to link up the potent strike force.

With Figo and Zidane in Real Madrid’s pulsating midfield, it was easy to see why Real Madrid created chances effortlessly and scored so many goals. Unfortunately, good times don’t last and cracks started to appear.

When another superstar, David Beckham, arrived (who left Manchester United as Alex Ferguson doesn’t appreciate the media circus), jealousy and selfishness abound. The egos in the dressing room were slighted that this pin-up footballer is now the center of attraction. Yes, Beckham serves up accurate long range boomers and swerving free kicks, but he has little else to offer.

Vicente Del Bosque (coach of Real Madrid at that time) was losing control of the Galacticos of Real Madrid, and he cannot satisfy everybody all the time. He has to rest certain players in order to refresh the squad or adjust his strategies as circumstances dictate, while an Englishman played more than he deserves because of TV revenue and sponsorships.

imagehandlerashx 300x225 Will Reals Spending Splurge Lead To Victory?

Casillas: All by himself with no defense.

It was a tough act to follow and a recipe for disaster. Players like Zidane and Figo consider it an affront to sit on the bench and disliked being played out of position. But that is what the squad had to do to accommodate David Beckham. To fit in all the Galacticos, the versatile players usually bear the brunt of the changes.

Figo is a right winger while Zidane, playing in the middle, is the soul of the team. With Beckham alternatively given the center or right midfielder role, you can imagine the hostile feelings being bottled by the existing Galacticos when their favorite spots are up for grabs.

Perez was oblivious to the simmering discontent and continued to buy attacking, attractive players who had little defensive abilities which lead to a weak backbone of Real Madrid. That policy saw its greatest irony in 2003 when Real Madrid plumped for David Beckham rather than Ronaldinho because the former is more appealing while the face of buck-toothed Ronaldinho may degrade Madrid’s brand and make them a laughing stock.

Well, we all know what an attacking talent Ronaldinho was. He proved his mettle by leading the resurgence of Barcelona to two straight La Liga titles and a Champions League Title as well as humiliating England in the World Cup. David Beckham can sell shirts but an attacking talent he is not. Period.

Unfortunately, the joke on Perez doesn’t end with the Ronaldinho saga. Sameul Eto’o was a Real Madrid player, but Perez sold him to Mallorca, who then profited by selling Eto’o to Barcelona where he would go on and become the top striker in the world. Perez’s argument was that Real Madrid already has Ronaldo and Raul as its strikers, the same reason he gave for not signing Ronaldinho, saying that Real Madrid already has Zidane in that position.

The attacking talents which Perez let slip from under his nose because he yearns for established stars, was not the biggest failing of the Galacticos policy. I will say Perez’s reluctance to pay world-class defensive players high salaries was the foremost reason which eventually lead to the destruction of the team.

When Claude Makelele demanded an improved contract after David Beckham came in and disrupted the wage structure, Perez showed him the door, together with Vicente Del Bosque. The arrival of Beckham and the departure of Makelele to Chelsea marked the downfall of the Galacticos.

After the sacking of Del Bosque, the internal strife in Real Madrid worsen and they could barely function as a footballing unit. Although Real Madrid still had the best attacking players in the world, they solid lacked defensive cover and even if David Beckham did not slag off his defensive duties, he has his limits.

The many frustrations eventually saw Luis Figo left the club to join Inter Milan after he was not given a two years contract by Real Madrid which he wanted. Michael Owen also left in the same season (2004-2005).

Eventually Perez also realized that, the galactico policy was not paying off and after throwing his beloved club into a turmoil, he stepped down as the president because of the decline in the team’s on-field performance seemingly hitting an all time low in the 2005-2006 season, exiting in the UEFA Champions League to Arsenal F.C. in the round of 16 without scoring a goal in either leg.

Lessons must surely have been learnt from the failure of the original galácticos, even if the only mistake Pérez has admitted to publicly was walking away. Does Perez now realize that it is more important to build a balanced team with attack and defense, and not just to sign players because they have mass appeal or that they had won football awards. The best could be behind these players and that is why their former clubs release them.

To be sure, the city of Madrid loves both superstar signings Perez had made. Kaka and Cristiano Ronaldo served as the essence of their former teams’ identity. Dubbed the ‘golden boy’ of Milan, Kaka was the crowd favourite and it seemed that Milan has parted with its football ambitions with the sale of Kaka.

Cristiano Ronaldo was the ultimate entertainer at Manchester United who played with panache and creativity. Like Beckham before him, Ronaldo coupled athletic superiority with a sex appeal to create an image that became very much a brand in its own right.

Both Ronaldo and Kaka are technically gifted players who can change a game in one moment of brilliance. La Liga is an environment where technical players thrive while Serie A is too stifling and Premier League clubs are often too physical and love their long balls.

In terms of sheer talent and ability, both are surely amongst the top five players in the world, although each is a year or two removed from his top form.

Last year, Ronaldo scored an astronomical 42 goals in all competitions – a figure of such extraordinary exception, it will be all but impossible for the Portuguese winger to repeat the feat. But this year, niggling injuries led to a slight dip in Ronaldo’s form and it is still uncertain how the player will recover from the sports hernia with which he is currently encumbered.

Meanwhile, Kaka suffered his own bout with injury this past season and the Brazilian struggled to find consistency on the pitch, although, just like Ronaldo, he did finish the campaign strongly.

With injuries in mind, Kaka’s age (27 years) does present an added concern, but even in his late twenties, the Brazilian is one of the fastest players in the sport, especially when running with the ball at his feet.

Ronaldo is stronger and more street-wise than Kaka after thriving in the Premier League. Depending upon how Manuel Paellegrini aligns them, they could play in very close proximity to each other, with Ronaldo playing high up on the wings or functioning as a fox in the hole forward while Kaka plays as an attacking midfielder.

The Brazilian national side has no shortage of strikers but Kaka has been used to combine with Robinho to superb effect. Real Madrid Fans will salivate at how the the Brazilian will pair with Cristiano Ronaldo. But there is the pertinent question of whether Kaka and Ronaldo can work together seamlessly?

Already, Cristiano Ronaldo refuses to share the limelight with Kaka and wants a separate occasion to be unveiled as a Real Madrid player. He also demanded outrageously higher wages to distinguish himself from Kaka. Ronaldo will earn a flat wage of £6.8m a year plus substantial add-ons and image-rights payments.

Kaka’s agent (his father) cannot be described as subtle when it comes to asking for money, so you can expect the wage structure in Real Madrid to be tested like never before, especially when Kaka outperform Ronaldo in the first season.

Also, have Real Madrid bolstered their defensive midfield spots and who will replace Iker Casillas should he get injured? Xabi Alonso would be a great addition – because he is disciplined and can run a game from deep. Playing him next to Lassana seems to be the natural choice for Pellegrini.

Right now, Real Madrid have an attacking midfield of Robben, Kaka, and Ronaldo but you will be hard pressed to see any of these players making a tackle.

While Real Madrid adopts a system of being the richest bidder who pluck the blossoming fruit off the mother tree but Barcelona painstakingly cultivate its own seedlings.

When it comes to building a team, Barcelona win hands down. They won the treble inspired from Guardiola’s philosophy of attacking possession football and with a largely homegrown squad in which 7 players of the starting 11 were products of their youth system (Víctor Valdés, Carles Puyol, Gerard Piqué, Xavi, Andrés Iniesta, Sergi Busquets, and Lionel Messi).

If I were to choose between building up players from youth teams or buying the end products, I will go for Barcelona’s system. I keep my fingers crossed on whether Real Madrid can spend its way to football supremacy.

Much has also been made on the tectonic shift in power to Spanish football. On the international level, Spain already rank as one of the finest team. In the Champions League, Barcelona demolished former champion, Manchester United in Rome, which was a further proof of the quality of Spanish football.

For the past few years, Premier League teams have consistently proceeded beyond the quarter-finals and ensured a strong English presence in the semi-finals and finals. The Premier League also basked in the glory of being the most watched league among Asian TV viewers.

However, the transfer moves by Perez could severely disrupt the Premier League standings. We will know the answer soon if the Champions Leauge will feature another four Premier League clubs or will the world’s attention just revolve around Barcelona and Real Madrid.

In any case, next season will promise lots of fireworks. Stay tuned for more updates.